From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 6, 1945
32 S.E.2d 919 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)

Opinion

30767.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 6, 1945.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Hendrix. November 7, 1944.

C. G. Battle, J. O. Ewing, for plaintiff in error.

Lindley W. Camp, solicitor, John A. Boykin, E. E. Andrews, solicitors-general, Durwood T. Pye, contra.


The defendant was convicted of the offense of stealing clothing of the value of $49.98. The evidence tending to connect him with the theft was wholly circumstantial and was insufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of his guilt. Therefore, the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence; and the overruling of the certiorari was error.

Judgment reversed. MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 6, 1945.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 6, 1945
32 S.E.2d 919 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 6, 1945

Citations

32 S.E.2d 919 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
32 S.E.2d 919