Accordingly, Franklin's sole contention on appeal presents no basis for overturning the judgment of conviction. Dix v. State, 307 Ga.App. 684, 686(1), 705 S.E.2d 903 (2011) (punctuation and footnote omitted) (rejecting sufficiency challenge to drug convictions based on claimed evidentiary weaknesses or inconsistencies, where evidence presented at trial met standard of Jackson, supra); see Davis v. State, 287 Ga.App. 478, 481–482(5), 651 S.E.2d 750 (2007) (rejecting sufficiency challenge to drug convictions, where arguments raised questions that merely demonstrated questions of fact for the jury); see further Smith v. State, 297 Ga.App. 526–528, 677 S.E.2d 717 (2009); Heller v. State, 275 Ga.App. 637–638(1), 621 S.E.2d 591 (2005); see also OCGA § 16–2–21 (concerning parties to a crime). The trial transcript reveals that the final charge to the jury included instructions on parties to a crime, joint and sole possession, and actual and constructive possession.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict. Smith v. State, 297 Ga. App. 526 ( 677 SE2d 717) (2009). We do not weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of the witnesses, but determine only whether the evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.