Smith v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Hughes v. State

    161 Tex. Crim. 300 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955)   Cited 10 times

    In the absence of a statement of facts, this court cannot pass upon the appellant's contention that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, Shaddix v. State, 90 Tex.Crim. 431, 235 S.W. 602; Lewis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 243 S.W.2d 706; and likewise, cannot appraise the exceptions to the court's charge, the refusal of a requested charge or the bills of exception complaining of the introduction in evidence of certain testimony. Smith v. State, 144 Tex.Crim. R., 161 S.W.2d 795; Whistler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 818, and Conde v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 252 S.W.2d 195. The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear regular; therefore, nothing is presented for review.