From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Jul 28, 1939
190 So. 696 (Fla. 1939)

Opinion

Opinion Filed July 28, 1939

A Writ of Error from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County, R.H. Rowe, Judge.

W.P. Chavous, for Plaintiff in Error;

George Couper Gibbs, Attorney General, and Thomas J. Ellis, Assistant Attorney General, for Defendant in Error.


We review on writ of error judgment of conviction of larceny of a hog.

The evidence of identity of the hog, the head of which was found in the possession of the accused, is uncertain and unsatisfactory and, we think, legally insufficient to support a verdict of guilty.

Especially is this true when we find in the record convincing and uncontradicted evidence produced from several disinterested and unimpeached witnesses that the head found in the possession of the accused was the head of an entirely different hog which accused had purchased from the true owner thereof in the regular course of business.

Justice demands that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

So ordered.

TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD, BROWN and CHAPMAN, J. J., concur.

THOMAS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Jul 28, 1939
190 So. 696 (Fla. 1939)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:ELZIE SMITH v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Division A

Date published: Jul 28, 1939

Citations

190 So. 696 (Fla. 1939)
190 So. 696

Citing Cases

Pella v. State

See Leslie v. State, 35 Fla. 171, 17 So. 555, 557. The decisions relied on by appellant in disputing the…

Morgan v. State

The evidence of identity of the automobile, which was found in the possession of the accused, is not…