From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 10, 1982
412 So. 2d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-827.

February 10, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Thomas E. Penick, Jr., J.

Ronald A. Dion of Entin, Schwartz, Angert, Dion Broudy, North Miami Beach, and Clyde M. Taylor, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Robert Lee Smith appeals his judgment and sentences for possession (count 1) and sale (count 2) of methaqualone. We affirm.

We decline to recede from our holding in Fundak v. State, 362 So.2d 295 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), that even in circumstances such as those here, where the possession and sale of a given drug arises out of a single episode, Section 775.021, Florida Statutes (1979), requires separate sentences where the possession is not a lesser included offense of the sale. Contra, Drayton v. State, 372 So.2d 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Williams v. State, 377 So.2d 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1980). We therefore affirm appellant's sentences.

Finding no merit to the other issues raised by appellant, we also affirm the judgment of guilt for both offenses.

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES and RYDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 10, 1982
412 So. 2d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 10, 1982

Citations

412 So. 2d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

McDONALD, Justice. We have accepted jurisdiction of this cause, pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3),…