From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 1, 1981
400 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-1810.

May 6, 1981. Rehearing Denied July 1, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, John S. Andrews, J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and David A. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We accept the reasoning of our sister court in Norman v. State, 388 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) that the automatic standing rule has not become a part of this state's law in order to survive the overruling of Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83, 100 S.Ct. 2547, 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980) and Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 100 S.Ct. 2556, 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980). Therefore, we affirm.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and GRIMES and RYDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 1, 1981
400 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER F. SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 1, 1981

Citations

400 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Kayes v. State

Automatic standing to challenge an unreasonable search and seizure no longer arises when a party is charged…