From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 29, 2006
943 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

affirming summary denial of the motions, "but without prejudice to appellant filing an amended motion that includes" the required oath

Summary of this case from Smith v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 4D05-2435.

November 29, 2006.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-25059 CF10A.

Michael S. Smith, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, but without prejudice to appellant filing an amended motion that includes the oath required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(c). Filing must be accomplished within thirty days of the date of this opinion to be considered timely.

POLEN, FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 29, 2006
943 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

affirming summary denial of the motions, "but without prejudice to appellant filing an amended motion that includes" the required oath

Summary of this case from Smith v. State
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael S. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 29, 2006

Citations

943 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

We specifically authorized the defendant to file yet another amended motion that was technically sufficient.…

1 Citing Cases