From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 26, 1993
625 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 93-355.

October 26, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Paul Siegel, J.

Edward Smith, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.


Upon the state's confession of error, with which we agree, the order denying the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(a), is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to set aside the defendant Edward Smith's sentence of twelve-years imprisonment for grand theft, third degree, imposed after declaring the defendant an habitual violent felony offender [§ 775.084(3), (4), Fla. Stat. (1989)] — and to impose a sentence not to exceed ten-years imprisonment with no eligibility for release for five years, together with appropriate credit for time served. We reach this result because the maximum sentence which may be imposed for a third-degree felony conviction [such as grand theft, third-degree, § 812.014(1), (2)(c), Fla. Stat. (1989), as here], after properly declaring the defendant an habitual violent felony offender is "a term of years not exceeding 10, and such offender shall not be eligible for release for 5 years." § 775.084(4)(b)(3), Fla. Stat. (1989).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 26, 1993
625 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD SMITH, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 26, 1993

Citations

625 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Chambers v. State

As conceded by the State, the sentence imposed in Case No. 90-15219 is illegal and must be reversed. "The…