From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 9, 1975
310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Summary

requiring that the written sentence reflect the precise number of days credit for time served

Summary of this case from Toombs v. State

Opinion

Nos. 74-519, 74-522.

April 9, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Gilbert A. Smith, J.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Edwin E. Taylor, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Sarasota, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by F.S. § 921.161(1), Grine v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 301 So.2d 122.

Remanded for correction of judgment and sentence; otherwise affirmed.

McNULTY, C.J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 9, 1975
310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

requiring that the written sentence reflect the precise number of days credit for time served

Summary of this case from Toombs v. State
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY LEE SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 9, 1975

Citations

310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Xiques v. State

The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time…

Woodie v. State

The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating that appellant was to receive credit for all time…