From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 2003
858 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D03-1703.

Opinion filed November 5, 2003.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jacqueline Hogan Scola, Judge. Lower Tribunal No.:97-15957.

Ben Arthur Smith, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Andrea D. England, Assistant Attorney General, (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN, and WELLS, JJ.


Ben Arthur Smith appeals from an order striking his Rule 3.800 motion for lack of jurisdiction. We reverse.

As the State properly concedes, the pendency of Smith's appeal from denial of an earlier filed Rule 3.850 motion did not deprive the court below of jurisdiction to consider the instant 3.800 motion which raised unrelated grounds. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800; McFarland v. State, 808 So.2d 274 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Hines v. State, 714 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Montague v. State, 710 So.2d 228, 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Bates v. State, 704 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Accordingly, the order striking Smith's May 9, 2003 Rule 3.800 motion is reversed with this matter remanded for consideration of that motion on the merits.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 2003
858 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:BEN ARTHUR SMITH, a/k/a KENNETH SMITH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 5, 2003

Citations

858 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Dugan v. State

As this court observed in Hines v. State, 714 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. dismissed, 727 So.2d 906…

Bryant v. State

Similarly, recent decisions from the Third District hold that a pending rule 3.850 appeal does not deprive…