Opinion
No. CIV S-05-1257 GEB KJN (TEMP) P.
February 16, 2011
ORDER
On February 2, 2011, plaintiff filed a document titled "motion for ruling as a matter of law." While it is not clear, plaintiff seems to present more arguments as to his position on defendant Runnels's June 28, 2010 motion for summary judgment, despite the fact that plaintiff has already opposed the motion and has not sought leave to file a supplemental opposition. In any case, the motion is not appropriate and is denied. Plaintiff is warned that if he continues to file motions which are clearly inappropriate, he will be sanctioned, including possible dismissal of this action.
DATED: February 15, 2011