From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 20, 1996
686 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-03896.

March 20, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; M. Wm. Graybill, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea Norgard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann P. Corcoran, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


The appellant, Don Smith a/k/a David Watts, appeals the trial court's judgments and sentences for the crimes of robbery and grand theft. We find no reversible error and affirm the convictions and the habitual offender sentences. We strike, however, the $255 in court costs because they were imposed by the trial court without citation to the applicable statutory authority. Callaway v. State, 658 So.2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

THREADGILL, C.J., and SCHOONOVER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 20, 1996
686 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:DON SMITH A/K/A DAVID WATTS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 20, 1996

Citations

686 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Woods v. State

The remaining $275 in court costs must be stricken because there is no statutory citation for this assessment…

Webster v. State

While a trial court may impose mandatory court costs without orally announcing the statutory authority at the…