From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III
Apr 12, 2023
2023 Ark. App. 209 (Ark. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

CR-22-460

04-12-2023

BRYAN SMITH APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Erin W. Lewis, for appellant. Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Brooke Jackson Gasaway, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


Appeal from the Crawford County Circuit Court [No. 17CR-19-980] Honorable Michael Medlock, Judge

Erin W. Lewis, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Brooke Jackson Gasaway, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.

Rita W. Gruber, Judge

A Crawford County jury convicted appellant Bryan Smith of attempted first-degree battery of a law enforcement officer and fleeing and sentenced him as a habitual offender to concurrent sentences of 480 months' and 180 months' imprisonment. On appeal, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the attempted-first-degree-battery conviction. In addition, he challenges three evidentiary rulings, arguing that the circuit court abused its discretion by allowing (1) the State to introduce proof of appellant's failure to appear as evidence of consciousness of guilt; (2) Trooper Roy Moomey to testify as to whether Trooper John Bass was justified in his actions; and (3) Trooper Roy Moomey to testify as to his opinion on appellant's guilt. We remand to settle and supplement the record.

At the conclusion of appellant's trial, the court read from the verdict forms handed by the jury foreperson to the bailiff in both the guilt and sentencing phases. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 3-4(c)(2) (2022) states that when there is a jury trial, the verdict forms shall be inserted in the record. Those forms, however, are not included in the record of the proceedings. This court has stated that if anything material to either party is omitted from the record by error or accident, we may direct that the omission be corrected and that a supplemental record be certified and transmitted. Perez v. State, 2015 Ark.App. 561, at 1-2; Ark. R. App. P.-Civ. 6(e) (as made applicable to criminal cases by Ark. R. App. P.-Crim. 4(a)); see also Lacy v. State, 2017 Ark.App. 509. Accordingly, we remand to the circuit court to settle and supplement the record with the jury-verdict forms. Appellant has thirty days from the date of this opinion to file a supplemental record with this court.

Remanded to settle and supplement the record.

VIRDEN and BROWN, JJ., agree.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III
Apr 12, 2023
2023 Ark. App. 209 (Ark. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN SMITH APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III

Date published: Apr 12, 2023

Citations

2023 Ark. App. 209 (Ark. Ct. App. 2023)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

This case returns after we remanded to settle and supplement the record with the verdict forms. See Smith v.…

Cockrell v. State

This court has stated that if anything material to either party is omitted from the record by error or…