From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District
Dec 22, 2022
No. 4D22-1321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2022)

Opinion

4D22-1321

12-22-2022

ANTRAEVIS PAKI SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Robert R. Berry of Law Office of Robert R. Berry, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2008-CF-004836B.

Robert R. Berry of Law Office of Robert R. Berry, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Damoorgian, Ciklin and Forst, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District
Dec 22, 2022
No. 4D22-1321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTRAEVIS PAKI SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 22, 2022

Citations

No. 4D22-1321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2022)