From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 12, 2020
298 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-1654

06-12-2020

Robin Cornellius SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court's order denying Appellant's motion to correct sentencing error. It is clear that Appellant was not sentenced to community control; thus, conditions 12–15 were not imposed and do not apply to him in this case.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 12, 2020
298 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN CORNELLIUS SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 12, 2020

Citations

298 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)