From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
May 22, 2020
299 So. 3d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-354

05-22-2020

Chad B. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Chad B. Smith, Orlando, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Chad B. Smith, Orlando, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus in Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2011-CF-385. We affirm the trial court's order and caution him that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2011-CF-385 may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) ; State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
May 22, 2020
299 So. 3d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHAD B. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 22, 2020

Citations

299 So. 3d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)