From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 13, 1976
542 S.W.2d 150 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976)

Opinion


542 S.W.2d 150 (Tex.Crim.App. 1976) Frank SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Nos. 52665 to 52667. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. October 13, 1976

Stephen M. Orr, Austin, for appellant.

Robert O. Smith, Dist. Atty., and Richard E. Banks, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lago Vista, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and David S. McAngus, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

These are appeals from final judgments forfeiting appearance bonds.

The appellant, a surety on the bonds, asserts there is insufficient evidence to support the judgment because the judgments nisi were not admitted in evidence. A final judgment forfeiting a bail bond must be supported by the judgment nisi. Fears v. State, 500 S.W.2d 815 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Purkey v. State, 494 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Morgan v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 117, 247 S.W.2d 94 (1952). The State did not offer in evidence the judgments nisi; the State concedes error.

The judgments are reversed and the causes are remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 13, 1976
542 S.W.2d 150 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Frank SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 13, 1976

Citations

542 S.W.2d 150 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Bob Smith Bail Bonds v. State

The State is not required to introduce the judgment nisi into evidence. The cases upon which appellant…