From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 17, 2022
Civil Action 21-4983 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 17, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-4983

08-17-2022

JEANETTE SCICCHITANO SMITH, et al. v. SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC., et al.


ORDER

Harvey Bartle III J.

AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2022, as set forth in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The motion of defendants Spectrum Brands Inc., Spectrum Brands Pet Groups Inc., and United Pet Group Inc. (collectively “Spectrum Brands”) for summary judgment (Doc. #33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

(2) Summary judgment is granted in favor of defendants Spectrum Brands and against plaintiffs Jeanette Scicchitano Smith and Alexander Smith on Count I insofar as plaintiffs seek to hold defendants strictly liable under a failure to warn theory.

(3) Summary judgment is granted in favor of defendants Spectrum Brands and against plaintiffs Jeanette Scicchitano and Alexander Smith on Count III for breach of warranty.

(4) The motion of defendants Spectrum Brands for summary judgment is otherwise DENIED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 17, 2022
Civil Action 21-4983 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE SCICCHITANO SMITH, et al. v. SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC., et al.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 17, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-4983 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 17, 2022)