From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Southwest Constr. (Sic) Supply & Sales, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01245-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01245-REB-MEH

08-09-2012

CARLOS SMITH, an individual, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHWEST CONSTRUTION (sic) SUPPLY & SALES, INC., a Colorado corporation, and PAUL FLORES, an individual, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on August 9, 2012.

Pending before the Court is a letter from Plaintiff dated August 7, 2012 [filed August 7, 2012; docket #22] which the Court construes a motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Plaintiff's motion is denied without prejudice for failure to comply Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(D) and D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1G. Rule 5(a)(1)(D) requires that a written motion filed with the Court must be served on every party. Local Rule 5.1G requires, in pertinent part, that "[e]ach paper, other than one filed ex parte, shall be accompanied by a certificate of service indicating the date it was served, the name and address of the person to whom it was sent, and the manner of service." The attachment to Plaintiff's motion provides the names and addresses of the named Defendants, but does not indicate service on these parties or their counsel of record.


Summaries of

Smith v. Southwest Constr. (Sic) Supply & Sales, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01245-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Southwest Constr. (Sic) Supply & Sales, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS SMITH, an individual, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHWEST CONSTRUTION (sic…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 9, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01245-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2012)