Smith v. Smith

Full title: Samuel Lee Smith, Jr., Appellant, v. Natasha Katherina Smith, Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Jun 19, 2024

No. 3D23-1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 19, 2024)

Opinion

3D23-1301

06-19-2024

Samuel Lee Smith, Jr., Appellant, v. Natasha Katherina Smith, Appellee.

Samuel Lee Smith, Jr., in proper person. Alexander Appellate Law P.A., and Samuel Alexander, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jason E. Dimitris, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 17-7498

Samuel Lee Smith, Jr., in proper person.

Alexander Appellate Law P.A., and Samuel Alexander, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ward v. Waters, 49 Fla.L.Weekly D72, at *2 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 3, 2024) (explaining that trial courts possess "substantial discretion in rendering decisions relating to the frequency, timing, duration, and conditions of timesharing" that "must be supported by a finding as to the best interests of the child") (citing Talarico v. Talarico, 305 So.3d 601, 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (explaining substantial discretion); and Davis v. Davis, 245 So.3d 810, 812 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (explaining findings related to the best interests of the child)).