From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Delaware
Jan 9, 2003
815 A.2d 349 (Del. 2003)

Opinion

No. 393, 2002

Submitted: January 7, 2003

Decided: January 9, 2003

Court Below: Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County File No. CS01-03245 CPI Nos. 01-04628 and 20-14082


Affirmed.

Unpublished opinion is below.

RUTH A. SMITH, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. RICHIE E. SMITH, Respondent Below, Appellee. No. 393, 2002 In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Submitted: January 7. 2003 Decided: January 9, 2003

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.

E. Norman Veasey, Chief Justice:

ORDER

This 9th day of January 2003, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in its decision dated July 19, 2002.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Delaware
Jan 9, 2003
815 A.2d 349 (Del. 2003)
Case details for

Smith v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:RUTH A. SMITH, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. RICHIE E. SMITH, Respondent…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 9, 2003

Citations

815 A.2d 349 (Del. 2003)

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Townsend

The court quoted the language of Mr. Justice Peckham in the case of Lochner v. New York. "There must be more…