From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2015
No. CV 10-1725 SJO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. CV 10-1725 SJO (FFM)

07-16-2015

NOEL RAY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. E.J. SMITH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant E. J. Smith is GRANTED, plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant is DISMISSED; and JUDGMENT is entered against plaintiff without prejudice. DATED: July 16, 2015.

/s/_________

S. JAMES OTERO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2015
No. CV 10-1725 SJO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:NOEL RAY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. E.J. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 16, 2015

Citations

No. CV 10-1725 SJO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2015)