From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Smith

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 18, 2013
No. 04-13-00733-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 04-13-00733-CV

12-18-2013

Joseph P. SMITH, Appellant v. Lori E. SMITH, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION


From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-09439

Honorable Gloria Saldaña, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
DISMISSED

The clerk's record was due on October 17, 2013, and has not been filed. The trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On November 19, 2013, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing by December 2, 2013, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Smith v. Smith

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 18, 2013
No. 04-13-00733-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:Joseph P. SMITH, Appellant v. Lori E. SMITH, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Dec 18, 2013

Citations

No. 04-13-00733-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2013)