From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Jun 16, 1989
441 N.W.2d 197 (Neb. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-569.

Filed June 16, 1989.

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: JAMES M. MURPHY, Judge. Affirmed.

Robert F. Peterson and Kelly S. Breen, of Laughlin, Peterson Lang, for appellant.

William T. Ginsburg, of Zuber Ginsburg, for appellee.

BOSLAUGH, SHANAHAN, and GRANT, JJ., and KNAPP and ROWLANDS, D. JJ.


Petitioner-appellant assigns as error the trial court's refusal to modify the alimony payments previously awarded respondent-appellee.

As required, we have reviewed the trial court's action de novo on the record. From that review we determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's application. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Appellee is allowed the sum of $500 for her attorney's services in this court.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Jun 16, 1989
441 N.W.2d 197 (Neb. 1989)
Case details for

Smith v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:W. BURTON SMITH, APPELLANT, v. JANET SHARON SMITH, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Jun 16, 1989

Citations

441 N.W.2d 197 (Neb. 1989)
232 Neb. 507

Citing Cases

Bending v. Bending

As required, we have reviewed the trial court's action de novo on the record. Smith v. Smith, 232 Neb. 507,…