Unless the wife is willing to live with her husband, she is not entitled to separate maintenance. Smith v. Smith, 293 So.2d 466 (Miss. 1974). For the foregoing reasons, we are of the opinion the chancellor erred in awarding separate maintenance to Mrs. Marble. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded without prejudice.
Long time, well established case law of this state is that the lower courts in instances such as that now before us may impose a lien on the husband's property in order to insure payment of alimony. Smith v. Smith, 293 So.2d 466 (Miss. 1974); Pierce v. Pierce, 267 So.2d 300 (Miss. 1972).