From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Shasta Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:21-cv-0877 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0877 JAM CKD P

06-06-2022

JAMES EDWARD SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 4, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 4, 2022, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Smith v. Shasta Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:21-cv-0877 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Shasta Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EDWARD SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-0877 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)