From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Sears, Roebuck Company

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 12, 2003
No. C 01-3252 CRB (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2003)

Opinion

No. C 01-3252 CRB

April 12, 2003

LANNY JAY, Monte Rio, CA., Attorney for the Plaintiff, Keith Smith.

MITCHELL BOOMER, Attorney for the Defendant Sears, Roebuck CO.


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER


It is hereby stipulated that the above-entitled action may be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his or its own costs.


Summaries of

Smith v. Sears, Roebuck Company

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 12, 2003
No. C 01-3252 CRB (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2003)
Case details for

Smith v. Sears, Roebuck Company

Case Details

Full title:KEITH SMITH, Plaintiff, vs. SEARS, ROEBUCK Co., a Corporation; DOE 1-DOE…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 12, 2003

Citations

No. C 01-3252 CRB (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2003)