From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Santa Rosa C.I.

Florida District Court of Appeals
Nov 2, 2022
386 So. 3d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-0438

11-02-2022

Tyrone L. SMITH, Appellant, v. SANTA ROSA C.I., Appellee.

Tyrone L. Smith, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Darlene F. Dickey, Judge. Tyrone L. Smith, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This appeal is of an order denying a motion for relief from judgment. The motion, which asserted fraud, was filed more than a year after rendition of the judgment, so it was untimely. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b). For us to consider an appeal from a denial of such a motion, the motion for relief from judgment must be both authorized and timely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(5).

Dismissed. All pending motions denied as moot.

Ray, Kelsey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Santa Rosa C.I.

Florida District Court of Appeals
Nov 2, 2022
386 So. 3d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Santa Rosa C.I.

Case Details

Full title:Tyrone L. SMITH, Appellant, v. SANTA ROSA C.I., Appellee.

Court:Florida District Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

Citations

386 So. 3d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)