From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Sacramento Superior Court

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-2537 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-2537 KJN P.

December 10, 2010


ORDER


On October 5, 2010, plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. 636(c). By order filed November 5, 2010, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

DATED: December 9, 2010


Summaries of

Smith v. Sacramento Superior Court

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-2537 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Smith v. Sacramento Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH A. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 10, 2010

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-2537 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)