From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Sacramento Main Courthouse

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 20, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2566 MCE DAD PS (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2566 MCE DAD PS.

May 20, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, Kenneth A. Smith, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion requesting that this matter remain in the Eastern District of California. (Doc. No. 8.) The transfer of this matter is not currently being contemplated. Plaintiff's motion will therefore be denied as unnecessary.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's October 5, 2010 motion for the case to remain in the Eastern District of California (Doc. No. 8) is denied as unnecessary.

DATED: May 19, 2011.


Summaries of

Smith v. Sacramento Main Courthouse

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 20, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2566 MCE DAD PS (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Smith v. Sacramento Main Courthouse

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH A. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO MAIN COURTHOUSE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2566 MCE DAD PS (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2011)