From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Runyon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jun 18, 2013
2:13-cv-00164-JAW (D. Me. Jun. 18, 2013)

Opinion

2:13-cv-00164-JAW

06-18-2013

ROBERT ALAN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ELMER RUNYON, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 22, 2013 her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 8). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on June 6, 2013 (ECF No. 9). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) be and hereby is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

______________

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Runyon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jun 18, 2013
2:13-cv-00164-JAW (D. Me. Jun. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Runyon

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ALAN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ELMER RUNYON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jun 18, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-00164-JAW (D. Me. Jun. 18, 2013)