From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:13-cv-2192 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)

Opinion


EARL D. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. R. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-2192 JAM AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 6, 2015

          ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On December 23, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 36. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed December 23, 2014, are adopted in full; and

         2. The motion to dismiss, ECF No. 20, filed by defendants Rodriguez and Singh is denied.


Summaries of

Smith v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:13-cv-2192 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:EARL D. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. R. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 6, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-2192 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)