From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Robert Marsh Co., Inc.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 18, 1934
138 Cal.App. 774 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)

Opinion

Docket No. 9234.

April 18, 1934.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lucius P. Green, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Harmel L. Pratt for Appellants.

West Andrews, Reuben G. Hunt and Fred N. Arnoldy for Intervener and Respondent.


MEMORANDUM CASES.


The same questions presented in this appeal are involved in the case of A.W. Burrill, as Trustee of the Estate of the United Finance Company, a Corporation, v. Robert Marsh Co., Inc., a Corporation, and Robert Marsh, this day decided ( ante, p. 101 [ 31 P.2d 823]). [1] Inasmuch as counsel are the same in each case, it will serve no useful purpose to set forth in this opinion the considerations and conclusions which are dealt with in detail in the opinion filed in Burrill v. Robert Marsh Co., Inc., and Robert Marsh. For the same reasons therein set forth the judgment in this case must be sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on May 18, 1934.


Summaries of

Smith v. Robert Marsh Co., Inc.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 18, 1934
138 Cal.App. 774 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
Case details for

Smith v. Robert Marsh Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN C. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT MARSH CO., INC. (a Corporation), et…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 18, 1934

Citations

138 Cal.App. 774 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
31 P.2d 826

Citing Cases

Burrill v. Robert Marsh Co., Inc.

HAHN, J., pro tem. Two cases involving the same questions are before us on appeal, one brought by A.W.…