From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Rivera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Nov 21, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-148 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-148

11-21-2015

BYRON SMITH v. R. W. RIVERA, ET AL.


ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Byron Smith, a federal prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Warden R. W. Rivera, Lieutenant Britt, Captain Wilson, Case Manager Coleman, Lieutenant Martinez, Case Manager Herberich, Unit Secretary Pennington, Case Manager Jones, Counselor Davis, Case Manager Singleton, Officer Critter, Officer Prejean, and Counselor Collins.

The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and the pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit. Further, plaintiff's claim that female correctional officers made lewd comments about the male inmates during a search does not state a cognizable constitutional claim. See Jane Doe 5 v. City of Haltom City, 106 F. App'x 906, 908 (5th Cir. 2004) (holding that verbal sexual harassment does not violate an inmate's constitutional rights).

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 15) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21 day of November, 2015.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Rivera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Nov 21, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-148 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:BYRON SMITH v. R. W. RIVERA, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Nov 21, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-148 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2015)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Peters

However, "[v]erbal sexual harassment does not violate [Moore]'s constitutional rights . . . ." See Jane Doe 5…