From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Rendell

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 2, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-1579 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-1579.

February 2, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Jeffrey Q. Smith's complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was submitted to the Court on December 2, 2009, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on December 30, 2009, recommended that the Complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiff was granted an extension oftime to file objections (Doc. 7) and did timely file objections on January 20, 2010.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 2th day of February, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bissoon (Doc. 5, dated December 30, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Smith v. Rendell

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 2, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-1579 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Smith v. Rendell

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY Q. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD G. RENDELL, and THOMAS CORBETT…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 2, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-1579 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2010)