From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Regency at Ridgmar

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Oct 24, 2024
No. 02-24-00202-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 24, 2024)

Opinion

02-24-00202-CV

10-24-2024

Willie Smith, Appellant v. Regency at Ridgmar, Appellee


On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024-001783-1

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

Appellant's brief was due on September 5, 2024. On September 24, 2024, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant's brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).


Summaries of

Smith v. Regency at Ridgmar

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Oct 24, 2024
No. 02-24-00202-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. Regency at Ridgmar

Case Details

Full title:Willie Smith, Appellant v. Regency at Ridgmar, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Oct 24, 2024

Citations

No. 02-24-00202-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 24, 2024)