Opinion
CASE NO. 7:16cv00111
05-09-2016
MONIQUE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. C. RATLEDGE, Defendant.
Memorandum Opinion
Monique Smith, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Warden C. Ratledge of the United States Penitentiary in Lee County, Virginia. Having reviewed the complaint, I conclude that Smith fails to state a claim against Ratledge and, therefore, I will dismiss his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).
To state a cause of action under Bivens, a plaintiff must allege facts indicating that he has been deprived of rights guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States and that this deprivation resulted from conduct committed by a person acting under color of federal law. Bivens, 403 U.S. at 397; West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988); see also Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 814-20 n.30 (1982) (finding that case law involving 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims is applicable in Bivens actions, and vice versa). Inasmuch as Smith alleges no facts against, or conduct committed by, defendant Ratledge, I conclude that Smith has failed to state a claim against Ratledge. See, e.g., Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (noting a plaintiff's basis for relief "requires more than labels and conclusions . . . ."). Accordingly, I will dismiss Smith's complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).
Entered this 9th day of May, 2016.
/s/_________
NORMAN K. MOON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE