Smith v. Purcell

Full title: ANTHONY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. R.N. PURCELL, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 9, 2007

No. CIV S-07-0198 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0198 WBS DAD P.

June 9, 2007

ORDER

WILLIAM SHUBB, District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 27, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110 (E.D. Cal. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).