From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Prince

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jul 8, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-2720 (W.D. La. Jul. 8, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-2720

07-08-2015

CLIFTON D. SMITH, Petitioner, v. HOWARD PRINCE, Respondent.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 11] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's petition [Doc. 1] be and hereby is DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Lake Charles, Louisiana, this 8 day of July, 2015.

/s/_________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Prince

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jul 8, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-2720 (W.D. La. Jul. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Prince

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON D. SMITH, Petitioner, v. HOWARD PRINCE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Jul 8, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-2720 (W.D. La. Jul. 8, 2015)