Smith v. Presidio Networked Sols.

Full title: KAMI SMITH, Plaintiff, v. PRESIDIO NETWORKED SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 26, 2024

Civil Action 22-736 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 26, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-736

06-26-2024

KAMI SMITH, Plaintiff, v. PRESIDIO NETWORKED SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant.

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

ORDER

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

AND NOW, this 26th day of June 2024, upon consideration of Plaintiff Kami Smith's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 98), Defendant Presidio Networked Solutions, LLC's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 103), Plaintiff's Reply (Doc. No. 107), Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 99), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 104), Defendant's Reply (Doc. No. 106), the parties arguments at the hearing on the Motions (Doc. No. 139), Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of her Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 150), Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 151) and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 98) is DENIED.

2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 99) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

a. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's hostile work environment and disparate pay claims based on gender

discrimination brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) as alleged in Count I of the Complaint (Doc. No. 1).

b. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's gender discrimination claim under Title VII as alleged in Count I of the Complaint.

c. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's gender discrimination, hostile work environment and retaliation claims brought under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 P.S. § 951, et seq. (“PHRA”) as alleged in Counts II and IV of the Complaint.

d. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's retaliation claim under Title VII as alleged in Count III of the Complaint.

e. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's disability discrimination and retaliation claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (“ADA”) as alleged in Counts IV and V of the Complaint.

3. The claims remaining in the case are: (1) gender discrimination, in violation of Title VII (Count I), (2) disability discrimination, in violation of the ADA (Count V) and (3) retaliation, in violation of the ADA (Count VI).