Opinion
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01632-CMA-BNB.
August 10, 2010
ORDER
This matter arises on the following:
(1) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [Doc. # 131, filed 7/20/2010] (the "Motion to Amend"); and
(2) Pizza Hut's Unopposed Motion to Seal Exhibit B to the Declaration of Shelley D. Cordova In Support of Pizza Hut's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [Doc. # 139, filed 8/4/2010] (the "Motion to Seal").
Also pending is:
(3) Pizza Hut's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion [Doc. # 106, filed 4/23/2010] (the "Motion to Dismiss").
I held a hearing on the motions yesterday and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Amend [Doc. # 131) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall accept for filing the Second Amended Complaint [Doc. # 131-1]. The defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint on or before September 8, 2010.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Seal [Doc. # 139] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 106] is DENIED AS MOOT and without prejudice in view of the filing of the Second Amended Complaint.