From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Pierce County Correctional Facility

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jun 24, 2009
CASE NO. C09-5269FDB (W.D. Wash. Jun. 24, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. C09-5269FDB.

June 24, 2009


ORDER


This Civil Rights Action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B), and Local Magistrate Judge's Rule MJR3 and MJR4. Since the filing of the order directing service in this action, plaintiff has begun filing "exhibits" and other papers. See, Dkt. # 9, 11, and 12. These filings contain medical records, letters, court documents from other proceedings, pamphlets and other miscellaneous materials. In addition, the clerk's office has received a large bundle of additional papers for filing. This bundle contains inmate statements, pamphlets from the American Diabetics Association, and other miscellaneous papers. With the exception of one two-page, handwritten document that requests the clerk to provide him forms for the appointment of counsel, none of the other papers are filed in reference to any particular motion or request.

The court now informs plaintiff that these are not proper filings because they are not filed with any particular motion or request. Therefore, they will not be considered by the court.

An exhibit or evidence must be submitted as an attachment to a motion that is properly served on opposing parties. This gives the opposing party an opportunity to object to the document if the opposing party believes that the filing is not proper and gives the opposing party an opportunity to respond to any motion filed. In the absence of any pending motion, these filings are not properly before the court.

The court now ORDERS:

1. The Clerk's office will return the bundle of papers to plaintiff unfiled.
2. Plaintiff is instructed to follow the Fed.R.Civ.P and the Local Rules regarding his future filings and he is reminded that a copy of everything he sends to court must be served on any party who appears in this action.
3. The handwritten paper addressed to the clerk requesting forms for appointment of counsel will be filed. The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff an Application for Court Appointed Counsel.
4. Dkt. Numbers 9, 11 and 12 will not be considered by the court.


Summaries of

Smith v. Pierce County Correctional Facility

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jun 24, 2009
CASE NO. C09-5269FDB (W.D. Wash. Jun. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. Pierce County Correctional Facility

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER LEON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Jun 24, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. C09-5269FDB (W.D. Wash. Jun. 24, 2009)