From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Phillips

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 1, 2016
651 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-6344

06-01-2016

GREGORY VINCENT SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS; CPL T WILSON, Tick; PEGGY E. SPIVEY; CRYSTAL HODGE; JIM MATTHEWS, Defendants - Appellees.

Gregory Vincent Smith, Appellant Pro Se. H. Thomas Morgan, Jr., Larry Shawn Sullivan, DUBOSE-ROBINSON, P.C., Camden, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03161-RBH) Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Vincent Smith, Appellant Pro Se. H. Thomas Morgan, Jr., Larry Shawn Sullivan, DUBOSE-ROBINSON, P.C., Camden, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory Vincent Smith appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Phillips, No. 1:14-cv-03161-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 3, 2016). We also deny Smith's motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Smith v. Phillips

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 1, 2016
651 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY VINCENT SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS; CPL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 1, 2016

Citations

651 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2016)