The court is even less inclined to grant leave to file a surreply where, as here, an announced aim is the clarification of previously cited case law and the proposed surreply seems to be part of a battle over which side should have the last word. McShares, Inc. v. Barry, 979 F.Supp. 1338, 1341 (D.Kan.1997); see also, Smith v. Phamm, 2008 WL 2474596 *4 (D.Kan. 6/17/2008). A. Summary judgment standards