From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 7, 2021
1:19-cv-00437-NONE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-00437-NONE-HBK

06-07-2021

JARMAAL SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. No. 18)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 3, 2021, the undersigned submitted Findings and Recommendations that this matter be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. No. 18). On June 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations, contending he had not received the Court's earlier Order to Show Cause because he was repeatedly transferred within the California correctional system. (Doc. No. 20). Plaintiff also recently filed a Notice of Change of Address. (Doc. No. 19). In his objections, Plaintiff states he wishes to prosecute this action, will keep the court appraised of his address, and does not wish to file an amended complaint but will proceed on his original complaint. (Doc. No. 20 at 2).

The Court will withdraw its Findings and Recommendation and screen Plaintiff's complaint in due course. Plaintiff is reminded that under Local Rule 183(b) it is his responsibility to apprise the Court of all address changes, and his failure to timely do so constitutes cause for dismissal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The Findings and Recommendations entered on May 3, 2021 (Doc. No. 18) are WITHDRAWN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 7, 2021
1:19-cv-00437-NONE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Pfeiffer

Case Details

Full title:JARMAAL SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 7, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-00437-NONE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2021)