From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Parrish

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).


We agree with the IAS court that defendant failed to show unusual or unanticipated circumstances justifying his delay in seeking to depose the non-party witness for more than two months after plaintiff's filing of a certificate of readiness ( 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; Goldsmith v Howmedica, Inc., 158 A.D.2d 335). The motion should also be denied for failure to demonstrate circumstances necessitating a non-party deposition (CPLR 3101 [a] [4]), in that defendant did not show that the information sought could not be obtained from other sources.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Kassal, Rubin and Smith JJ.


Summaries of

Smith v. Parrish

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Smith v. Parrish

Case Details

Full title:KAREL SMITH, Respondent, v. LOUIS PARRISH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)