From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Pabon

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jul 24, 2023
3:23-CV-42-CLC-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 24, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-CV-42-CLC-JEM

07-24-2023

CODY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. JASON PABON, ERIC FRAILLEY, and ADAM SOUTHERN, Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

CURTIS L. COLLIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order, Plaintiff's pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Pabon

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jul 24, 2023
3:23-CV-42-CLC-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Pabon

Case Details

Full title:CODY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. JASON PABON, ERIC FRAILLEY, and ADAM SOUTHERN…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Jul 24, 2023

Citations

3:23-CV-42-CLC-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 24, 2023)