From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 11, 2016
143 A.3d 891 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 224 MAL 2016.

08-11-2016

Derek SMITH, Respondent v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Petitioner.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Does the Commonwealth Court's decision conflict with this Court's decision in Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole?


Summaries of

Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 11, 2016
143 A.3d 891 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Case Details

Full title:DEREK SMITH, Respondent v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 11, 2016

Citations

143 A.3d 891 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

The Board filed a timely petition for allowance of appeal, and we granted review to determine whether the…

Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

The Board filed a timely petition for allowance of appeal, and we granted review to determine whether the…