From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Dec 5, 2024
Civ. 2:24-cv-00388-KRS (D.N.M. Dec. 5, 2024)

Opinion

Civ. 2:24-cv-00388-KRS

12-05-2024

ARIEL MICHELE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ANSWER

KEVIN R. SWEAZEA, J.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon Defendant's First Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. 21), it being stated that Plaintiff concurs in the granting of the motion, the Court having read the motion and being fully advised in the premises finds that there is good cause to grant the motion.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to and including January 3, 2025. Plaintiff may file a reply, if any, fourteen (14) days, after Defendant files its brief.


Summaries of

Smith v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Dec 5, 2024
Civ. 2:24-cv-00388-KRS (D.N.M. Dec. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:ARIEL MICHELE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Dec 5, 2024

Citations

Civ. 2:24-cv-00388-KRS (D.N.M. Dec. 5, 2024)