From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Oil Corporation

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1938
198 S.E. 636 (N.C. 1938)

Opinion

(Filed 28 September, 1938.)

APPEAL by defendants from Johnston, J., at July Term, 1938, of BUNCOMBE.

C. E. Blackstock and J. W. Haynes for plaintiff, appellee.

Heazel, Shuford Hartshorn for defendants, appellants.


Civil action to recover damages for alleged negligent injury.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff was injured by the negligence of the defendants in placing "an inherently dangerous explosive . . . containing a mixture of gasoline and kerosene . . . in a retail garage or filling station," without proper safeguards, which was ignited by a match and exploded, resulting in injury to the plaintiff.

A demurrer was interposed upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Demurrer overruled in the general county court; ruling sustained on appeal to the Superior Court; defendants again appeal.


Without debating the matter, we agree with the courts below that the complaint is good as against a demurrer. See Diamond v. Service Stores, 211 N.C. 632, 191 S.E. 358; Stone v. Texas Co., 180 N.C. 546, 105 S.E. 425; Newton v. Texas Co., ibid., 561, 105 S.E. 433.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Oil Corporation

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1938
198 S.E. 636 (N.C. 1938)
Case details for

Smith v. Oil Corporation

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WILLIAM SMITH, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, TOM C. SMITH, v. SHELL UNION OIL…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1938

Citations

198 S.E. 636 (N.C. 1938)
198 S.E. 636